Though 60 million Americans live in rural areas, their health issues are often understudied. Of modalities tested, mailed surveys provided the best opportunity to perform geographically targeted rural health surveillance. Though in-person surveys had higher response rates, convenience sampling failed to obtain a geographically distributed sample of rural residents. These findings are consistent with declining response rates of phone surveys, which obtained an inadequate sample of rural residents. Unadjusted and age-adjusted prevalence estimates were similar between mailed and in-person surveys, but not for phone surveys. All modalities had lower proportions of Hispanic respondents compared to Census estimates. Costs to perform phone surveys were substantially higher than mailed or convenience in-person surveys. Overall response rates were 27.0% by mail, 8.2% by phone, and 71.4% for convenience in-person surveys. MethodsĬomparisons were made for response rates, estimated costs, respondent demographics, and prevalence estimates of a brief health survey delivered by mail and phone using address-based sampling, and in-person using convenience sampling at a sub-county level in New York’s rural Sullivan County during 2017. These health surveys were administered in New York’s rural Sullivan County, which has some of the poorest health outcomes in the entire state. The goal of this study was to identify cost-effective methods of deploying geographically targeted health surveys in rural areas, which often have limited resources. Worsening socioeconomic conditions in rural America have been fueling increases in chronic disease and poor health.

R kelly double up bonus tracks zip